Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 66 Download : 68

Main Article Content

Abstract

Currency-Hedged Deposits (CHD) were introduced in Türkiye to hedge the currency risk. Hence, it is aimed to provide macroeconomic stability in this country. Nevertheless, the impact of this implication on banks' participation is unclear. This study analyzes the impact of the foreign exchange hedge deposit (CHD) mechanism on the financial performance of participation banks in Türkiye. This study integrates fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making analysis with panel data regression. In this framework, data from these banks for 2021-2023 is considered. First, panel regression analysis is conducted for six participating banks. Second, a Euclidean distance-based CIMAS technique is used to find the most critical criteria. For this purpose, Fermatean fuzzy numbers are considered in this modelling process to handle uncertainties more effectively. The main contribution of this research is the hybrid consideration of panel data regression and fuzzy decision-making analysis. Owing to this combination, the impact of this new implication on bank participation can be more effectively identified. Econometric results indicate that CHD has a positive impact on profitability. On the other hand, risk management and compatibility with interest-free financing are the most critical factors.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Internal control audit Trust issues Decision-making model

Article Details

How to Cite
Duran, S., Eti, S., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2025). Integrating panel data regression and fuzzy decision-making approaches to evaluate the impact of currency-hedged deposits on participating banks. Future Technology, 5(1), 234–241. Retrieved from https://fupubco.com/futech/article/view/615
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Bookmark and Share

References

  1. Eksi, O., & Stetsyuk, I. (2025). Unconventional Monetary Policies and Foreign Exchange Swaps: The Case of Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 61(9), 2704-2728. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2025.2466702
  2. Ozgur, O., & Aslan, M. (2025). Monetary policy stance and foreign currency lending: evidence from a persistently dollarized emerging market. Economic Change and Restructuring, 58(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-025-09895-y
  3. İlarslan, K. (2025). Threshold Effect of Inflation on the Relationship between Stock Market Index and Interest Rate. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(4), 779-795. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1581213
  4. Kaya, H. P. (2022). Döviz dönüşümlü kur korumalı Türk Lirası mevduat hesaplarının vergi usul kanunu kapsamında muhasebeleştirilmesi. Mali Çözüm Dergisi 32(172), 117-132.
  5. Yayman, D. (2022). Kur korumalı mevduat sistemi ve vergilemenin amaçları üzerine bir değerlendirme. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi , 31(2), 526-535. https://doi.org/10.58308/bemarej.1240921
  6. Akgemci, A. (2022). Kur korumalı mevduat hesabının TFRS 9 kapsamında muhasebeleştirilmesi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 8(97), 1347-1352. https://doi.org/10.29228/sssj.61143
  7. Kaldırım, Z., ve Selvi, Y. (2023). Kur korumalı ve dönüşüm destekli mevduat hesaplarındaki saklı türevlerin muhasebeleştirilmesi. Mali Çözüm Dergisi 33(175), 13-38.
  8. Álvarez-Díez, S., Alfaro-Cid, E., and Fernández-Blanco, M. O. (2016). Hedging foreign exchange rate risk: Multi-currency diversification. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25(1), 2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.redee.2015.11.003
  9. Du, J., Wang, J.-N., Hsu, Y.-T., and Lai, K. K. (2018). The importance of hedging currency risk: Evidence from CNY and CNH. Economic Modelling, 75, 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.06.007
  10. Bag, S., and Omrane, A. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and ıts overall effects on financial performance: Empirical evidence from Indian companies. Journal of African Business, 23(1), 264-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1826884
  11. Baltagi, B. H., & Li, Q. (1991). A Lagrange multiplier test for the error components model with incomplete panels. Econometric Reviews, 10(1), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939108800169
  12. Hsiao, C. (2022). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057745
  13. Musolesi, A., Golinelli, D., & Mazzanti, M. (2025). Modelling green knowledge production and environmental policies with semiparametric panel data regression models. Empirical Economics, 68(1), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02634-8
  14. Jawadi, F., Pondie, T. M., & Cheffou, A. I. (2025). New challenges for green finance and sustainable industrialization in developing countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Economics, 142, 108120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108120
  15. Ma, C., Song, M., Zeng, W., Wang, X., Chen, T., & Wu, S. (2025). Enhancing urban emergency response: A Euclidean distance-based framework for optimizing rescue facility layouts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 118, 106006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.106006
  16. Héberger, K. (2025). Sum of Euclidean Distance Differences and Sum of Absolute Manhattan Distance Differences: multicriteria decision making tools for small data tabes. Analytica Chimica Acta, 344649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2025.344649
  17. Yalçın, G. C., Kara, K., Edinsel, S., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D. (2025). Authentication system selection for performance appraisal in human resource management using an intuitionistic fuzzy CIMAS-ARLON model. Applied Soft Computing, 171, 112786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112786
  18. Shakeel, H. M., Farid, H. M. A., Iram, S., Hill, R., & Simic, V. (2025). Multi-stage decision support system for evaluating visual energy performance certificate platforms. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 101767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2025.101767
  19. Rahman, A. (2024). MEREC-WISP (S) Integration Extended with Fermatean Fuzzy Set for Requirement Prioritization. Foundation University Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (HEC Recognized Y Category, ISSN 2706-7351), 4(1), 37-60.
  20. Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simic, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., & Bacanin, N. (2025). A new criteria importance assessment (Cimas) method in multi-criteria group decision-making: Criteria evaluation for supplier selection. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 23(2), 335-349.