Main Article Content

Abstract

The realization of smart governance highly relies on the effective integration and collaborative utilization of cross-departmental government data, yet data silos that have formed over time and the privacy compliance risks faced by traditional centralized sharing models severely constrain the improvement of collaboration effectiveness. Addressing this challenge, this study proposes the FedGov privacy-preserving federated learning framework for smart governance scenarios, designing a three-layer system architecture comprising data, computation, and coordination layers to support multi-departmental heterogeneous data collaboration, and developing the FedGov-DP algorithm integrating dual mechanisms of differential privacy and secure aggregation to realize the "data usable but invisible" cross-departmental collaboration paradigm. Systematic experiments simulating government scenarios based on public datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively breaks down data silos and achieves significant collaboration gains, the differential privacy mechanism effectively defends against membership inference attacks, and the method exhibits good adaptability to moderate data heterogeneity common in government scenarios. This study extends the application boundaries of federated learning in the public governance domain, provides a new technical pathway for addressing the government data silo dilemma, and the constructed framework with parameter configuration guidelines offers technical support and practical reference for smart governance digital transformation.

Keywords

Federated learning Smart governance Privacy protection Differential privacy Data silos

Article Details

Author Biography

Que Zhang, School of Cross-border E-commerce, Yango University, Fuzhou 350015, China

Que Zhang was born in Huludao, Liaoning, P.R. China, in 1988. She received the bachelor‘s degree from Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, P.R. China. Now, she works in School of Cross-border E-commerce, Yango University. Her research interest include English Teaching, Senior Care Service.

How to Cite
Zhang, Q. (2026). Federated learning for breaking data silos in smart governance: a privacy-preserving framework for cross-agency collaboration. Future Technology, 5(2), 179–188. Retrieved from https://fupubco.com/futech/article/view/770
Bookmark and Share

References

  1. J. R. Gil-Garcia, A. Guler, T. A. Pardo, and G. B. Burke, "Characterizing the importance of clarity of roles and responsibilities in government inter-organizational collaboration and information sharing initiatives," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 101393, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101393
  2. C. Dong, J. Liu, and J. Mi, "How to enhance data sharing in digital government construction: A tripartite stochastic evolutionary game approach," Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 212, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11040212
  3. G. Hammerschmid, E. Palaric, M. Rackwitz, and K. Wegrich, "A shift in paradigm? Collaborative public administration in the context of national digitalization strategies," Governance, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 411-430, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12778
  4. X. Zhang, "A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, p. 101981, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101981
  5. L. Lyu, H. Yu, J. Zhao, and Q. Yang, "Threats to federated learning," in Federated Learning: Privacy and Incentive: Springer, 2020, pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63076-8_1
  6. Q. Li et al., "A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3347-3366, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3124599
  7. C. Zhang, Y. Xie, H. Bai, B. Yu, W. Li, and Y. Gao, "A survey on federated learning," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 216, p. 106775, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2021.106775
  8. V. Mothukuri, R. M. Parizi, S. Pouriyeh, Y. Huang, A. Dehghantanha, and G. Srivastava, "A survey on security and privacy of federated learning," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 115, pp. 619-640, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.10.007
  9. X. Yin, Y. Zhu, and J. Hu, "A comprehensive survey of privacy-preserving federated learning: A taxonomy, review, and future directions," ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1-36, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460427
  10. R. Gosselin, L. Vieu, F. Loukil, and A. Benoit, "Privacy and security in federated learning: A survey," Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 9901, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199901
  11. K. Hu, S. Gong, Q. Zhang, C. Seng, M. Xia, and S. Jiang, "An overview of implementing security and privacy in federated learning," Artificial intelligence review, vol. 57, no. 8, p. 204, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10846-8
  12. S. Pandya et al., "Federated learning for smart cities: A comprehensive survey," Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 55, p. 102987, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102987
  13. Y. Y. Ghadi et al., "Integration of federated learning with IoT for smart cities applications, challenges, and solutions," PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 9, p. e1657, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1657
  14. S. Rani, A. Kataria, S. Kumar, and P. Tiwari, "Federated learning for secure IoMT-applications in smart healthcare systems: A comprehensive review," Knowledge-based systems, vol. 274, p. 110658, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110658
  15. S. P. Karimireddy, S. Kale, M. Mohri, S. Reddi, S. Stich, and A. T. Suresh, "Scaffold: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning," in International conference on machine learning, 2020: PMLR, pp. 5132-5143. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/karimireddy20a.html
  16. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in Artificial intelligence and statistics, 2017: PMLR, pp. 1273-1282. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html
  17. S. Zhang, W. Yuan, and H. Yin, "Comprehensive privacy analysis on federated recommender system against attribute inference attacks," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 987-999, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2023.3297040
  18. J. C. Jiang, B. Kantarci, S. Oktug, and T. Soyata, "Federated learning in smart city sensing: Challenges and opportunities," Sensors, vol. 20, no. 21, p. 6230, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20216230
  19. D. A. E. Acar, Y. Zhao, R. M. Navarro, M. Mattina, P. N. Whatmough, and V. Saligrama, "Federated learning based on dynamic regularization," arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.04263, 2021. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04263
  20. K. Wei et al., "Federated learning with differential privacy: Algorithms and performance analysis," IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, vol. 15, pp. 3454-3469, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2020.2988575
  21. K. Bonawitz et al., "Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning," in proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2017, pp. 1175-1191. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3133982
  22. T. Li, A. K. Sahu, M. Zaheer, M. Sanjabi, A. Talwalkar, and V. Smith, "Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks," Proceedings of Machine learning and systems, vol. 2, pp. 429-450, 2020. Available: https://proceedings.mlsys.org/paper_files/paper/2020/hash/38af86134b65d0f10fe33d30dd76442e-Abstract.html
  23. J. Wang, Q. Liu, H. Liang, G. Joshi, and H. V. Poor, "Tackling the objective inconsistency problem in heterogeneous federated optimization," Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 7611-7623, 2020. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/564127c03caab942e503ee6f810f54fd-Abstract.html
  24. X. Wu, Y. Zhang, M. Shi, P. Li, R. Li, and N. N. Xiong, "An adaptive federated learning scheme with differential privacy preserving," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 127, pp. 362-372, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.09.015
  25. C. Chen et al., "Trustworthy federated learning: privacy, security, and beyond," Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 2321-2356, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02248-x
  26. N. Rieke et al., "The future of digital health with federated learning," NPJ digital medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 119, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1
  27. M. Nasr, R. Shokri, and A. Houmansadr, "Comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning: Passive and active white-box inference attacks against centralized and federated learning," in 2019 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP), 2019: IEEE, pp. 739-753. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2019.00065
  28. Q. Li, Y. Diao, Q. Chen, and B. He, "Federated learning on non-iid data silos: An experimental study," in 2022 IEEE 38th international conference on data engineering (ICDE), 2022: IEEE, pp. 965-978. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE53745.2022.00077
  29. M. Gasco-Hernandez, J. R. Gil-Garcia, and L. F. Luna-Reyes, "Unpacking the role of technology, leadership, governance and collaborative capacities in inter-agency collaborations," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, p. 101710, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101710
  30. R. Geyer, T. Klein, and M. Nabi, "Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective," arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557, 2017. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07557
  31. X. Liu and L. Zheng, "Cross-departmental collaboration in one-stop service center for smart governance in China: Factors, strategies and effectiveness," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. S54-S60, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.12.001
  32. D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, P. N. Pathirana, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, and H. V. Poor, "Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey," IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1622-1658, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3075439
  33. M. Fang, X. Cao, J. Jia, and N. Gong, "Local model poisoning attacks to {Byzantine-Robust} federated learning," in 29th USENIX security symposium (USENIX Security 20), 2020, pp. 1605-1622. Available: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity20/presentation/fang
  34. J. So, B. Güler, and A. S. Avestimehr, "Turbo-aggregate: Breaking the quadratic aggregation barrier in secure federated learning," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 479-489, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAIT.2021.3054610