Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): August 2022 Issue

Solar power satellites: technical challenges and economic feasibility

Gerardo Antonio Urdaneta
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arkansas Tech University, 1811 N Boulder Ave, Russellville, AR, 72801, USA
Christopher Meyers
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arkansas Tech University, 1811 N Boulder Ave, Russellville, AR, 72801, USA
Lauren Rogalski
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arkansas Tech University, 1811 N Boulder Ave, Russellville, AR, 72801, USA

Corresponding Author(s) : Gerardo Antonio Urdaneta

gerar4406@gmail.com

Future Energy, Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): August 2022 Issue

Abstract

World energy consumption is constantly rising; therefore, it is essential to investigate different possibilities to produce power in the medium and long term. The sun is a clean source of power that is virtually inexhaustible. Photovoltaic (PV) power stations are used to harness this energy, but they are not completely reliable since they depend on weather patterns. To overcome this problem, large satellites with extensive solar panel surfaces can be placed in orbit. These satellites, known as Solar Power Satellites (SPS), would be positioned in geostationary orbit (GEO) thus constantly providing energy while avoiding meteorological conditions and erosive factors. These benefits make solar power station an appealing option for the energy of the future. Therefore, in this paper, the possibility and challenges of using solar-powered satellites are explored. The mechanisms regarding microwave transmission, photovoltaic collection, radiation impact, and propulsion are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of solar-powered satellites are discussed regarding cost and practicality, and the current race between different countries to achieve this technology was examined. It was found that power could be collected with an efficiency of over 30% using gallium-arsenide photovoltaic cells. To minimize radiation effects, the use of a 100-micron transparent Pilkington Borosilicate Glass (commercially known as CMG cover glass) could be employed. For spacecraft propulsion, Hall thrusters provide the optimal combination between efficiency and thrust. Finally, the cost analysis indicates that to make the SPS viable, launch costs to GEO must be decreased by a factor of 10, solar panel efficiency must be increased to 40%, panel density must be minimized, and international cooperation must be achieved.

Keywords

Solar Power Microwave Transmission Specific Impulse Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
Urdaneta, Gerardo Antonio, Christopher Meyers, and Lauren Rogalski. 2022. “Solar Power Satellites: Technical Challenges and Economic Feasibility”. Future Energy 1 (2):09-16. https://fupubco.com/fuen/article/view/19.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J.C. Mankins, N. Kaya, M. Vasile, SPS-ALPHA: The first practical solar power satellite via arbitrarily large phased array (A 2011-2012 NASA N1AC project), in: Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3978.
  2. S. Weitemeyer, D. Kleinhans, T. Vogt, C. Agert, Integration of Renewable Energy Sources in future power systems: The role of storage, Renewable Energy. 75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.028.
  3. ROUGE JD, A.F. Study, Space-Based Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Security Report to the Director , National Security Space Office, 2007.
  4. A. Smith, T.B. Johansson, R.T. Watson, M.C. Zinyowera, R.H. Moss, Space Solar Power: An Idea Whose Time Will Never Come?, Renewable Energy. (2003).
  5. B.S. Sasaki, How Japan Plans to Build an Orbital Solar Farm, IEEE Spectrum. (2014).
  6. J.C. Mankins, A fresh look at space solar power: New architectures, concepts and technologies, Acta Astronautica. 41 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(98)00075-7.
  7. J.C. Mankins, N. Kaya, Solar energy from space: An international assessment of opportunities, issues and potential pathways forward abstract, in: International Astronautical Federation - 59th International Astronautical Congress 2008, IAC 2008, 2008.
  8. D.R. Criswell, R.G. Thompson, Data envelopment analysis of space and terrestrially-based large scale commercial power systems for earth: A prototype analysis of their relative economic advantages, Solar Energy. 56 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(95)00113-6.
  9. P.R. Harris, Solar power satellites - The emerging energy option, Space Policy. 10 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-9646(94)90045-0.
  10. J.K. Strickland, Advantages of solar power satellites for base load electrical supply compared to ground solar power, Solar Energy. 56 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(95)00087-8.
  11. R.H. Nansen, Wireless power transmission: the key to solar power satellites, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine. 11 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/62.484148.
  12. M. Williams, Stanford breakthrough could make better chips cheaper, Https://Www.Computerworld.Com/Article/2901383/Stanford-Breakthrough-Could-Make-Better-Chips-Cheaper.Html . (2015).
  13. N. Lior, Power from space, Energy Conversion and Management. 42 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(01)00040-1.
  14. F. Leverone, M. Pini, A. Cervone, E. Gill, Solar energy harvesting on-board small satellites, Renewable Energy. 159 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.176.
  15. P.E. Glaser, O.E. Maynard, J. Mackovciak, E.L. Ralph, FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A SATELLITE SOLAR POWER STATION., NASA Contractor Reports. (1974).
  16. W.C. Brown, The History of Power Transmission by Radio Waves, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 32 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.1984.1132833.
  17. R.M. Dickinson, Power in the sky: Requirements for microwave wireless power beamers for powering high-altitude platforms, IEEE Microwave Magazine. 14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2012.2234632.
  18. E.E. Eves, Beamed Microwave Power Transmission and its Application to Space, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. 40 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1109/22.141357.
  19. R.M. Dickinson, W.C. Brown, Radiated microwave power transmission system efficiency measurements, NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 75 (1975).
  20. P. Espinet-Gonzalez, E. Barrigón, G. Otnes, G. Vescovi, C. Mann, R.M. France, A.J. Welch, M.S. Hunt, D. Walker, M.D. Kelzenberg, I. Åberg, M.T. Borgström, L. Samuelson, H.A. Atwater, Radiation Tolerant Nanowire Array Solar Cells, ACS Nano. 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b05213.
  21. A. Hamache, N. Sengouga, A. Meftah, M. Henini, Modeling the effect of 1 MeV electron irradiation on the performance of n+-p-p+ silicon space solar cells, Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.02.025.
  22. J. Li, A. Aierken, Y. Liu, Y. Zhuang, X. Yang, J.H. Mo, R.K. Fan, Q.Y. Chen, S.Y. Zhang, Y.M. Huang, Q. Zhang, A Brief Review of High Efficiency III-V Solar Cells for Space Application, Frontiers in Physics. 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.631925.
  23. A. ur Rehman, S.H. Lee, S.H. Lee, Silicon space solar cells: progression and radiation-resistance analysis, Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.68.593.
  24. B.R. Bhat, N. Upadhyaya, R. Kulkarni, Total radiation dose at geostationary orbit, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 52 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2005.846881.
  25. S.P. Singh, B. Karmakar, Bismuth oxide and bismuth oxide doped glasses for optical and photonic applications, in: Bismuth: Characteristics, Production and Applications, 2012.
  26. E. el Allam, C. Inguimbert, S. Addarkaoui, A. Meulenberg, A. Jorio, I. Zorkani, NIEL calculations for estimating the displacement damage introduced in GaAs irradiated with charged particles, in: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/186/1/012005.
  27. J.M. Hu, Y.Y. Wu, Z. Zhang, D.Z. Yang, S.Y. He, A study on the degradation of GaAs/Ge solar cells irradiated by <200 keV protons, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 266 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.11.010.
  28. J.E. Borovsky, T.E. Cayton, M.H. Denton, R.D. Belian, R.A. Christensen, J.C. Ingraham, The proton and electron radiation belts at geosynchronous orbit: Statistics and behavior during high-speed stream-driven storms, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA022520.
  29. P.A.White, A COVERGLASS FOR GaAs SOLAR CELLS , IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists. (1990).
  30. E. Plis, V.J. Murray, D.P. Engelhart, K.W. Fulford, A. Sokolovskiy, D.C. Ferguson, R.C. Hoffman, Solar panel coverglass degradation due to the simulated GEO environment exposure, in: 2021. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2588655.
  31. Claybaugh W, Redmond C, Commercial space transportation study, (1997). http://stp.msfc.nasa.gov/stpweb/Co (accessed April 15, 2022).
  32. D. Krejci, P. Lozano, Space Propulsion Technology for Small Spacecraft, Proceedings of the IEEE. 106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2778747.
  33. I. Levchenko, S. Xu, G. Teel, D. Mariotti, M.L.R. Walker, M. Keidar, Recent progress and perspectives of space electric propulsion systems based on smart nanomaterials, Nature Communications. 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02269-7.
  34. S.J. Hall, S.E. Cusson, A.D. Gallimore, 30-kW Performance of a 100-kW Class Nested-channel, 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference. (2015).
  35. MUNCHO J. MBUNWE, UDOCHUKWU B. AKURU, HILARY U. EZEA, OGBONNAYA I., Some Aspects of Future Energy Generation in Using of Solar Power Satellites, International Journal of Analysis and Applications. (2020). https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-18-2020-117.
  36. B.B. GARDAS, M.V. TENDOLKAR, DESIGN OF COOLING SYSTEM FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC PANEL FOR INCREASING ITS ELECTRICAL EFFICIENCY, International Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. (2013). https://doi.org/10.47893/ijmie.2013.1129.
  37. H.W. Jones, The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost, 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems. (2018).
  38. D. Li, Z. Pan, The Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope project, Radio Science. 51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RS005877.
  39. The Emerging Competition for Space Solar Power | Global Policy Journal, (n.d.). https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/21/10/2019/emerging-competition-space-solar-power (accessed April 23, 2022).
  40. China plans a solar power play in space that NASA abandoned long ago, (n.d.). https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/15/china-plans-a-solar-power-play-in-space-that-nasa-abandoned-long-ago.html (accessed April 24, 2022).
  41. L.W. Wood, Projecting power: The security implications of space-based solar power, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340211433005.
  42. ESA - ESA reignites space-based solar power research, (n.d.). https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Preparing_for_the_Future/Discovery_and_Preparation/ESA_reignites_space-based_solar_power_research (accessed April 23, 2022).
  43. ETERNAL ENERGY | NewsChina Magazine, (n.d.). http://www.newschinamag.com/newschina/articleDetail.do?article_id=6846&section_id=17&magazine_id=71 (accessed April 24, 2022).
  44. D. Cyranoski, Japan sets sights on solar power from space, Nature. 462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/462398b.
  45. Research on the Space Solar Power Systems (SSPS) | JAXA | Research and Development Directorate, (n.d.). https://www.kenkai.jaxa.jp/eng/research/ssps/ssps-index.html (accessed April 25, 2022).
  46. Use of electricity - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), (n.d.). https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/use-of-electricity.php (accessed April 25, 2022).
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 816 Download : 88

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.